What Is Differential Reinforcement in ABA? DRI, DRA, DRO & DRL

Written by AppliedBehaviorAnalysisEdu Editorial Staff, Last Updated: August 21, 2026

Quick Answer

Differential reinforcement is an ABA strategy that builds better behavior by reinforcing the right responses while reducing reinforcement for unwanted ones. Rather than punishing problem behavior directly, it aims to help that behavior fade by lowering the attention or reward that was keeping it going. There are four main types: DRI, DRA, DRO, and DRL, each suited to different situations.

If you’ve spent any time in an ABA classroom or read through a behavior intervention plan, you’ve almost certainly come across the term differential reinforcement. It sounds technical, but it’s actually a pretty intuitive idea once you see it in practice.

Here’s the core concept: behavior that gets reinforced tends to stick around. Behavior that doesn’t get reinforced tends to fade. Differential reinforcement takes that principle and applies it in a precise, intentional way.

What Is Differential Reinforcement?

Differential reinforcement is a behavior intervention strategy that does two things at once. It reinforces a target behavior (the one you want to see more of) while withholding reinforcement from a competing behavior (the one you want to see less of).

That second part is what makes it “differential.” You’re not treating all behaviors the same. You’re deliberately applying reinforcement selectively based on what the person does.

In practice, this often means identifying and reducing the reinforcer that’s maintaining the unwanted behavior, once that consequence is actually confirmed to be relevant, whether that’s attention, access to items, or escape from a task. When a behavior is attention-maintained, for example, this may involve reducing attention paid to it. Not every differential reinforcement procedure requires withholding the original reinforcer this way. DRA, for instance, can work by reinforcing an alternative without necessarily removing the stimulus that was reinforcing the problem behavior.

Behavior May Temporarily Increase When Reinforcement Is Withdrawn

When reinforcement is first withheld, the unwanted behavior may escalate for a while before it improves, though this doesn’t happen in every case. This is called an extinction burst, and it’s the moment most plans fall apart. If you give in and reinforce the behavior during a burst, you risk teaching the person that escalating gets results. Staying consistent is what gets you through it.

This approach doesn’t involve punishment. The goal isn’t to make the unwanted behavior feel bad. It’s to make the desired behavior feel worth repeating.

The Four Types of Differential Reinforcement

There isn’t just one version of differential reinforcement. ABA practitioners use four distinct types, and choosing the right one depends on the specific behavior and the goal you’re trying to achieve. Here’s a quick snapshot of all four, followed by a closer look at each.

DRI: Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior

Reinforce a behavior that physically can’t happen at the same time as the problem behavior.

Best for: A specific physical action, like staying in your seat instead of wandering.

DRA: Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior

Reinforce an appropriate alternative that serves the same function as the problem behavior.

Best for: Behaviors with a clear communicative purpose, like demanding or attention-seeking.

DRO: Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior

Reinforce the absence of the problem behavior during a set time interval.

Best for: Reducing how often a behavior occurs over a time window.

DRL: Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates

Reinforce the behavior only when it happens at or below a set frequency.

Best for: Behaviors that are fine in small amounts but become a problem when excessive.

Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behavior (DRI)

DRI targets behaviors that can’t occur simultaneously. If the problem behavior is leaving a seat without permission, the incompatible behavior is staying seated. A student can’t be both in their seat and out of their seat simultaneously.

How it looks in practice: if attention is what’s maintaining the behavior, a teacher might reduce attention each time the student gets up and leaves their seat. Every time the student remains seated during independent work, the teacher gives specific praise or a small reward instead. Over time, staying seated becomes the behavior that pays off.

DRI works well when there’s a clear physical behavior you’re trying to reduce and an equally clear opposite behavior you can reinforce.

Differential Reinforcement of Alternative Behavior (DRA)

DRA is similar to DRI, but the alternative behavior doesn’t have to be physically incompatible. It just needs to be a better way to achieve the same result.

A good example: a child who grabs food from the table without asking. If getting food is what’s driving the behavior, the parents might hold off on giving food when the child grabs. But the moment the child politely asks, a parent turns, acknowledges, and meets the request. The function of the behavior (getting food) stays the same. The method changes.

DRA is especially useful when a problem behavior is serving a communicative purpose. Instead of eliminating the need, you’re teaching a more appropriate way to meet it.

Differential Reinforcement of Other Behavior (DRO)

DRO shifts the focus from a specific replacement behavior to the absence of the problem behavior over time. Reinforcement is delivered when the target behavior does not occur during a specified time interval.

Say a child repeatedly leaves the table during dinner. A parent sets a 10-minute timer. If the child stays at the table for the full 10 minutes, they earn extra television time after dinner. You’re not rewarding a specific action. You’re rewarding restraint within a defined window.

DRO is a flexible option when you don’t have a specific replacement behavior in mind, and you want the problem behavior to occur less often.

Differential Reinforcement of Low Rates (DRL)

DRL takes a different angle. Some behaviors aren’t inherently inappropriate. The problem is how often they happen. DRL reinforces the behavior when it stays at or below an acceptable frequency.

Consider a child who washes their hands repeatedly before meals. Washing once before eating is sufficient for hygiene, but washing four or five times goes beyond what’s typically needed. A teacher using DRL would reward the child for staying within a reasonable number of washes, not for repeating the behavior indefinitely. Over time, the excessive frequency decreases without eliminating the behavior.

DRL is the right tool when the goal is moderation rather than elimination.

Which Type Should You Use?

With four options on the table, it helps to work backward from the situation you’re facing rather than the label. Here’s a quick way to sort it out.

Match Your Situation to a Type

There’s a clear opposite behavior I can reward insteadGo with DRI. It works best when the replacement behavior is physically incompatible with the one you’re reducing.
The behavior seems to be a way of communicating a needGo with DRA. Teach and reinforce a better way to get the same outcome.
I want it to happen less often, but I don’t have a specific replacement in mindGo with DRO. Reward the absence of the behavior across a set interval.
The behavior itself is fine, it just happens too muchGo with DRL. Reinforce it only when it stays at or below an acceptable rate.
FIND SCHOOLS
Sponsored Content

Differential Reinforcement Beyond the Classroom

Most people first learn about differential reinforcement in the context of working with children with ASD. But the strategy isn’t limited to that setting.

Consider a workplace example. A manager wants all questions routed through email, not voicemail. An employee leaves a voicemail about a scheduling issue, and the manager holds off on responding to that channel. The next week, the employee sends an email with the same type of question, and the manager responds promptly. That’s DRA in a professional setting.

The underlying principle applies anywhere behavior is being shaped: sports coaching, parenting, classroom management, and organizational behavior. ABA techniques show up in more places than most people realize. If you’re curious about where ABA therapy extends beyond autism treatment, our guide to ABA therapy for non-autistic populations is worth a read.

Frequently Asked Questions

What’s the difference between DRI and DRA?

DRI requires that the replacement behavior be physically incompatible with the problem behavior. They can’t happen at the same time. DRA is broader: the alternative behavior needs to be more appropriate, not physically impossible, than the problem behavior. In both cases, you’re reinforcing something positive while withholding reinforcement from the unwanted behavior.

Does differential reinforcement use punishment?

No. Differential reinforcement is a reinforcement-based approach and doesn’t inherently require the addition of a punishing consequence. Some versions also use extinction or other procedures alongside reinforcement, but the core idea is rewarding the behavior you want more than the one you don’t.

What happens when you first start using differential reinforcement?

It’s possible to see unwanted behavior worsen for a while before it improves, though this doesn’t happen every time. When it does, it’s called an extinction burst. Reinforcement is suddenly withheld, and the person may temporarily increase the intensity or frequency of the behavior, trying to get the response they’re used to. Staying consistent is what gets you through it. If you reinforce during a burst, you risk teaching the person that escalating gets results.

How is differential reinforcement used alongside other ABA techniques?

Differential reinforcement is often part of a broader behavior intervention plan. It works well alongside prompting, extinction, and functional communication training. For function-based interventions, a behavior analyst may conduct or draw on a functional behavior assessment to understand why the behavior occurs and select an appropriate reinforcement strategy.

Key Takeaways

  • It’s not about punishment: Differential reinforcement shapes behavior by reinforcing what you want and reducing reinforcement for what you don’t. The unwanted behavior tends to fade because it no longer pays off as reliably.
  • Four types, four use cases: DRI and DRA work best when you have a clear replacement behavior in mind. DRO works when you want a behavior to occur less often. DRL is for behaviors that are acceptable in small amounts but become a problem when excessive.
  • Context matters: You’ll encounter differential reinforcement throughout ABA practice, from early intervention with children with ASD to organizational and educational settings. Understanding how it works is foundational, whether you’re studying for the BCBA examination, working as an RBT, or a parent trying to understand your child’s treatment plan. If you’re on the path to becoming a behavior analyst, take a look at our guide to top ABA master’s programs and find a program that fits your goals.
  • It fits into a bigger picture: Differential reinforcement rarely works in isolation. For a deeper look at the reinforcement principles it builds on, our article on reinforcement in ABA covers the broader framework.

Ready to put this knowledge to work? Explore ABA programs that prepare you for real-world behavior intervention from day one.

Find ABA Programs Near You

author avatar
AppliedBehaviorAnalysisEdu Editorial Staff
We've covered applied behavior analysis education, BACB certification, and ABA careers since 2016. Certification and licensure requirements on this site are verified against current BACB handbooks and state regulatory sources rather than secondary summaries, and we date every figure so you can tell how current it is. Salary and employment data comes directly from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Faculty perspectives throughout our guides come from our own interview series with professors at 61 ABA programs nationwide, conducted by us and published in full. Where the evidence is genuinely mixed, we say so instead of picking the tidier answer.